Detecting Cancer Far Earlier than Traditional Means..Part 6 of 7

The EDS Biosurvey Cancer Cascade.   The “Cancer Cascade,” or the biochemical changes that occur in the human body, takes about 8 years before cancer cells develop into a tumor detectable by traditional means. That Cancer Cascade involves the pH in various tissues becoming too acidic, too oxygen-deprived, and the immune system and organ functioning weakened. An anaerobic condition where sugars ferment lead to you becoming a prime host for mutated cells to proliferate.

The EDS Biosurvey can determine where in the Cascade your body currently is.

You may be aware of the Biomeridian or Zyto devices, that use energy (via electrical conductivity on meridian acupuncture points on the hands), to survey the health of organs corresponding to those points. (Remember that electrocardiograph and electroencephalograph, tools of the medical profession, record electrical activity from the heart and brain respectively. So this is a well known methodology.)

Practitioners using the EDS Biosurvey protocol can review your results against a the range of programmed possibilities to identify weakened areas, long before a tumor has time to occur. Then, using the tool to assess which of the Nutraceuticals products balance the energy in identified problem areas.

Bill Coury brought this system and the line of anti-cancer formulas to the U.S. 12 years ago. Lisa Caller is the acupuncturist extensively trained in using the testing device, which takes about 90 minutes to complete. This modality was the thing I was most curious to learn about, since it may be the only real early-detection tool to find out if you are beginning to develop cancer, long before you could find a mass.

To make a long, technical story short, Lisa tests each of the acupressure points in your fingers relative to the stored frequencies in her technology, to determine if you are in healthy range for specific cancer cells. Then, if you have some activity for a specific type of cancer, she tests you against known Chinese herbal/mushroom supplements, and the amount you test for tells whether you have an extremely small amount of that cancer, or if it’s a larger problem. If it’s a larger problem, you would test to take 12 to 17 of that anti-carcinogen supplement.

I tested positive for only one cancer element in the possibilities: the blood. (Lisa said the vast majority, almost everyone, shows positive in one or more of those areas, indicating a weakness.) And I tested to take only ½ of a capsule of the supplement. This shows that it is a very tiny imbalance.

(The Gerson Therapy, the book, refers to Dr. Gerson’s assessment that everyone would eventually get leukemia with all the chemicals now in our environment. This goes to my constant statement that we cannot afford not to eat primarily whole, organic, raw plant foods and undergo the education I put out on this blog and site.) (Incidentally, Liliana, Dr. Connealy’s nutritionist who eats an extremely clean diet like I do, tests the same—only the blood, and ½ a supplement.)

5 thoughts on “Detecting Cancer Far Earlier than Traditional Means..Part 6 of 7

Leave a Comment
  1. I think the money raised could go to people that cant afford holistic treatment. Also Robyn, I had my blood levels taken and my Ferretin level was at 7. Below 10 is not good. I was taking the liquid light at the time and eat a number if high iron foods that are vegan. Do you have any other recommendations?

  2. have you ever thought about starting a WALK to raise $$ and awareness on holistic healing across the country and funds go into this type of research for cancer and get it widely broadcasted? starting a new type of cancer survivor walk? wearing GREEN shirts for smoothies/raw veggies?

Leave a Reply